Now we are seven

And another Labour councillor jumps ship and rejects their own transport boss’s BRT plan for the Railway path …

This time, after only 40-odd years in the Labour Party, Labour’s Lawrence Hill councillor, Brenda Hugill finally manages an entirely sane, rational and commonsensical view on something.

She tells Bristol Indymedia:

“The people of Lawrence Hill are overwhelmingly against this proposal which seeks to destroy one of the few amenities they have. We have already seen the community divided by the M32 and the inner ring road. Now is the time to stop carving this area up.”

Brenda’s joined in her independent media photocall by Easton Councillor Faruk Choudhury and Bristol West PPC Paul Smith.

Smith is once again flogging his tired “This BRT plan’s got nothing to do with the Labour Party, honest guv” line, telling, what he hopes must be some very credulous readers, “The Path has been put under threat by consultants working for the West of England Partnership.”

As if.

Maybe Paul’s secretive consultants entered Bristol under the cover of night in order to evade all known authorities as well? And perhaps they drew up their evil, secret BRT plans using the blood of virgins on parchment made from the skin of innocent socialists from a top secret cave hidden somewhere deep beneath the Clifton Gorge too? And maybe these plans were then passed, via a complex network of agents sworn to secrecy, to those shadowy bureaucrats-of-the-night at the West of England Partnership?

Alternatively it could be that the consultants were invited by our local politicians to draw up the plans on their behalf because that’s how the system actually works.

Posted in Bristol, Developments, Environment, Labour Party, Lawrence Hill, Local government, Politics, Transport, WESP | Tagged , | There are 4 comments

Job of the week

Congatulations Bath and North East Somerset for coming up with an utterly brilliant way to spend local tax payers money with a job even more nonsensical than our local authority here in Bristol can manage.

Yes. We now urgently need people from the local authority to explain to us how to explain to our children how to cross a road …

Location Keynsham
Job Title Child Pedestrian Trainer
Salary £15,153 – £15,842
Closing Date 04/4/2008
Reference No. 07-5211


As part of the Road Safety Team you will be responsible for delivering the Council’s new Child Pedestrian Training Programme. You will work in selected primary schools in Bath & North East Somerset with children and their parents, to equip the children with the skills they need to become safer pedestrians. Blah, blah, blah …

If you want to know more you need to speak to a Road Safety Officer called – wait for it – Lorry!

Posted in Bath, Local government | Tagged | There are 3 comments

Minute of the week

“There remain two key issues over documentation issued to the Forum – timeliness and quality.”
Bristol Schools Forum, Minutes of the meeting 29 January 2008 (pdf)

Take a bow Bristol’s £140k a year education boss Heather Tomlinson, who – along with her equally skilled and capable £2m a year management gang and their various hangers-on – don’t seem to be capable of performing simple administrative tasks like getting accurate reports and information to the Bristol Schools’ Forum on time so that they can make properly informed decisions about the education of our children.

Now, the Bristol Schools’ Forum is not some irrelevant talking shop like most city council forums. It’s responsible for allocating the Dedicated Schools Grant (DSG) to our schools. This grant received by Bristol City Council from the Department of Education amounts to around £500m over three years.

Perhaps a little more pertinently, the forum is also responsible for deciding how much of the DSG should be “top-sliced” from each of our schools and handed to Heather and her managers to pay their absurd wages, fund their dubious CONsultants and generally toss inconsequentially about with.

So what support do Heather and her million pound gang provide to our Schools’ forum then? Why they play politics with it of course and embark on endless money-grabbing missions by continually providing poor and inaccurate information at the very last minute in order to try to blind, bully and harass the forum into decisions financially advantageous to themselves.

Some of the outrageously shabby conduct we’ve discovered from Heather and co. includes them demanding extra cash from the forum for pet CONsultant-friendly projects, which were “not backed up with any data” and then once the programme directors responsible [on a salary in excess of £100k a year] were rumbled, we find they don’t bother to turn up to explain themselves.

We’ve also come across “ill conceived proposals” for ‘Healthy Living’ funding stuffed under the noses of the forum that had to be rejected while a “demand” for additional funding to provide more HR resources for Heather – after considerable challenge from the chair and vice chair – also had to be hastily withdrawn at the last minute.

And then there’s this intriguing minute:

“On the agenda this evening we had a proposal affecting Key Stage 4 funding allocations, which again after challenge by [the chair] (on the grounds that it made no sense), and by our Vice Chair, on the grounds that (1) it was contrary to advice he and another secondary head who sits on the forum had provided, and (2) that it had not been discussed with all secondary heads, has been withdrawn.”

The purpose of all this nonsense is, of course, for Heather’s big-spending department to try and effectively maintain control of the DSG budget for themselves by making the Schools Forum an unmanageable mess. They can then continue to grab money meant for our schools to fund themselves, their screwball schemes and their armies of private education CONsultants.

Isn’t it nice to know that the senior education managers of a failing education authority are spending their time and concentrating their efforts on feathering their own nests directly at the expense of our schools and kids?

The situation is so bad that the Bristol Schools’ Forum Chair, has stated on the record “There may be a need to appoint a new Chair at the next Schools’ Forum meeting”

Perhaps instead someone could call Heather a taxi?

Posted in Bristol, CONsultants, Education, Local government | Tagged , | There are 4 comments

Bradshaw lies bleeding …

St George West councilor, Ron Stone has now put his opposition to the Railway Path in writing:

My feelings on the issue tend to remain one of severe concern, and at present if asked to support this suggestion I would vote against it.

He also says:

I am due to attend a meeting with Mark Bradshaw the Cabinet Executive Member for Transport on Wednesday evening and this is the major item on the agenda.

So it looks like Labour councillors are meeting to arrange the inevitable climbdown.

And judging from Labour’s Bristol West Parliamentary candidate Paul Smith’s comments on this blog:

The plans are currently drifting in a virtual world of consultants, partnerships and council officers. I am not aware of any ‘political’ meeting that has endorsed these plan.

It looks like Labour are going to try and pretend its’ all the fault of officers who were working without the knowledge of councillors.

Mind you, it’s a pretty sad state of affairs when your best defence is to admit to being an incompetent who doesn’t know what’s going on.

But then we’ve been saying on this blog for some time now that this is a Labour administration in office but not in power

Posted in Bristol, Developments, Environment, Labour Party, Local government, Politics, St George, Transport, WESP | Tagged , , | There are 11 comments

McCarthy shockers!!

Couple of interesting items on Bristol East Labour MP Kerry McCarthy’s blog.

Firstly, to give you a further idea of the chaotic, leaderless, anti-democratic shambles which is the BRT plan for the Railway Path we get this from Kerry:

I have fired off letters to various people, asking for more info about the West of England Partnership’s plans for the Rapid Bus Link, but haven’t had any formal response yet.

That’s right. Despite having spent a small fortune on CONsultants, council officers’ salaries, feasibility studies, drawings, plans, meetings, Project Initiation Documents, strategies, briefing documents, presentations, reports and god knows what other crap, nobody involved is capable of explaining to a local MP whose constituency contains the path what the fuck is going on!

Our city safe in their hands, eh?

Elsewhere Kerry has managed to run into a little bit of trouble on a couple of blogs over her views on MPs expenses. She’s even had to remove the links to the blogs because they “used incredibly profane language and lots of school pupils look at my website, e.g. in school citizenship lessons.”

Sod that. Here at the Blogger we’ll take the risk that the kind of school pupil with the wherewithal to look beyond the hell of New Labour’s demented school curriculum, its citizenship propaganda and its set texts can deal with the word fuck when they see it. So the blogs in question are here and here.

Anyway, McCarthy ran into these problems after announcing:

I don’t know quite know what the solutions are [to the issue of MPs expenses]

This is pretty extraordinary. Surely someone who’s openly pitching for a job in government – where they would be, at the very least, partly responsible for vast sums of public money – must realise a system of financial accountability based solely on trust is actually a form of institutionalised corruption?

Would anyone put their money in a bank where your money was not properly recorded and you just had to trust the bank staff?

The solutions Kerry seems to find so complex are actually perfectly straightforward. MPs’ expenses simply need to be fully recorded, accounted and independently verified. What does Kerry think every other public organisation publishes audited accounts for? Fun?

But then given her government’s apparent policy of getting any major problems or anomalies with their public sector accounts smoothed out by their auditor over expensive lunches in the very best Westminster restaurants, it’s hard to tell what they think isn’t it?

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Labour Party, MPs, Politics, Transport, WESP | Tagged , , | There are 8 comments

STOP PRESS: It's game over for Bradshaw as Lib Dems come off the fence

Stabbed in the back by his own party, now Bristol’s Lib Dems have kicked Bradshaw right in the bollocks!

The Lib Dems have tonight announced their opposition to a BRT route on the cyclepath. Eastville Lib Dem councillor Muriel writes:

Dear Xxxxx,

Please be assured that, all being well, I shall be attending the
meeting. My attendance at these meetings is 100% returning on one occasion from Spain and from a works conference in Bournemouth!

I will be supporting Charlie Bolton’s motion as will my Lib Dem
colleagues. If it fails because of the Tory/Labour pact we will
instigate a named vote so everyone in Bristol will know the
councillors who support the scheme and those who don’t.

I would like this proposal knocked on the head, apart for the obvious heinousness of it I have no confidence that First Bus would comply with any agreement and, like its other service in city, would be a total disaster, would ruin the well loved cycle path, cause a whole lot of demolition – and for what?

You can guess I feel very strongly about this issue!

All the best

Muriel

The Lib Dems 31 seats combined with the six Labour rebels – so far – and Green Charlie Bolton gives the pro-Railway Path councillors a 38 – 31 majority in the council chamber.

Not even Bradshaw’s best political friends Bunter Eddy and the Tories can save him now!

Ha, ha, ha.

Posted in Bristol, Developments, Environment, Lib Dems, Local government, Politics, Transport, WESP | Tagged , | There are 2 comments

More Labour councillors give their own policy the finger

The fingerBRISTOL LABOUR PARTY ARE REVOLTING!!!

BRADSHAW ON THE PRECIPICE!!!

IT’S A BIG LABOUR NO TO BRT!!!

Dear oh dear. Another week begins with another THREE Labour councillors publicly rejecting their own transport boss, Mark Bradshaw’s BRT plan for the Bristol and Bath Railway path out of hand!

First up, from deep inside the old Labour territory of St George West, we have Councillor John Deasy writing on behalf of himself and his fellow St George West councillor, influential backbench old-stager Ron Stone:

—– Original Message —–

From: “John Deasy”
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: Bristol Railway Path

Xxxxxx,

This idea was first put forward in the late 1980s, it failed then because of the same reasons being put forward by opponents today.

This issue has generated the largest amount of interest in St. George West we have seen for a very long time. No one has contacted either of us to give support to this idea – so it is logical that Ron and myself represent the interests of the people of St. George West and oppose this proposal.

From a personal point of view I have cycled on the track ever since it was opened and I would be very unhappy if it was disturbed in any way.

Best wishes

John Deasy

Then we have this from yet another Labour backbencher, Frome Vale’s Bill Payne:

Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 11:59:39 +0000
From: “Bill Payne” bill.payne@bristol.gov.uk
Subject: Re: Railway path

Hi Xxxxxxx,

many thanks for your email. I will, of course, pass on your concerns to Mark Bradshaw, the Executive Member for Transport. I have already spoken to him to express my own concerns and fully support your opposition to the proposal.

I would remind you that that is all it is at present, a proposal. It was one idea among several put forward in a report from a group of consultants.

There have been no decision made and my own feeling is that this particular proposal is a non-starter, there are too many difficulties (bridges etc.) to make it economically viable. However, we need to make it clear to the planners that this proposal would not be acceptable.

Again, thanks for your email; if there is anything else I can do don’t hesitate to contact me.

Best wishes,

Bill.

Cllr. Bill Payne
Councillor for Frome Vale
Tel: 07894 994 600

That’s now SIX Labour councillors against Bradshaw’s plan that we know of. It’s game over Mark. Quit now or you’re headed for a very public humiliation indeed sonny …

Posted in Bristol, Developments, Environment, Labour Party, Local government, St George, Transport, WESP | Tagged , , , , | There are no comments yet

The new flame …

As Helen Holland motors down to the Council House this fine morning – no doubt with the strains of New labour-style socialist Mick Hucknall’s ‘New Flame’ blaring at full volume – to meet her new Chief Exec Jan Ormondroyd, apparently an alchemist with the ability to turn base metal into gold for £180k a year, perhaps now is the time to look at Jan’s idea of loyalty.

Take a look at this. It’s Jan introducing a conference on staff retention at Suffolk Coastal District Council when she was very briefly Chief Exec there:

SUFFOLK WORKFORCE PLANNING PARTNERSHIP

MEETING 26 NOVEMBER 2004

Theme of meeting:

Addressing staffing shortages in key areas such as Planning, Environmental Health, Social Work, etc.

 

9.45 Welcome and Introduction Jan Ormondroyd, Chief Executive, Suffolk Coastal District Council

 

10.0 Getting off the poaching merry-go-round

Lucy Ashwell, Regional Advisor, EERA will talk about a collaborative approach to tackling staffing shortages.


Within months of explaining the need to “get off the poaching merry-go-round” – no doubt with her hand placed firmly on her heart – Jan was off to a new post as Deputy Chief Exec at Hull after staying at Suffolk for all of nine months!

And two years later, what d’ya know? Jan’s been poached by top-of-the range recruitment consultants Rockpool to come to Bristol for £180k a year.

In the last ten years loyal Jan has also managed a stint working at Prescott’s Office of the Deputy Prime Minister and she was head of policy at Bradford for a while. That’s just the five jobs in under ten years then

Posted in Bristol, Labour Party, Local government | Tagged | There is 1 comment

A Ladybird easy reading book …

Ladybird book of cops

This has already appeared on Bristol Graffiti and Bristle KRS but is more than worth repeating again.

An unusual ‘Ladybird easy reading book’ appeared for e-bay auction recently …

Posted in Banksy, Bristol, Culture, Policing | | There are no comments yet

Ignoble Savage better for you than Greens?

No sign yet of a formal press release announcing the arrival of “Junket” Jan Ormondroyd to run Bristol City Council.

So we’ll just have to make do with the one that the council’s PR girl Simon Caplan did back in December.

Presumably in the spirit of co-operation and compromise it lists the views of all the political party leaders at the council.

So Labour leader Helen Holland says: “[Jan] will bring to Bristol the skills and experience needed to support councillors in our drive to make a real difference to the lives of local people – and promote our city regionally, nationally and internationally.”

While Lib Dem leader Stevie Comer says: “I am very pleased to be able to welcome Jan to Bristol.”

Tory leader Bunter Eddy meanwhile says: ” I believe we have made an excellent appointment that will be good for the city council and for Bristol as a whole.”

And Business West boss John Savage says: “” I am delighted at the new appointment. Business West looks forward to continuing good partnership working with Bristol City Council and we wish the new Chief Executive every success.”

Hang on a minute …

Did we just mention unelected multi-millionaire Business West boss, Merchant Venturer and SWRDA Board member John Savage?

And since when did he become entitled to equal billing alongside Bristol’s elected representatives? What’s going on here?

And where’s the Green Party’s view on all this? Why don’t they get a say?

Usually we’re told that, legally and constitutionally, the Green Party aren’t formally recognised as a political party for funding and administrative purposes by Bristol City Council because they only have one councillor and they need at least two to be treated as a party.

Now it appears this situation around funding and administration has been arbritarily interpreted by Simon Caplan and the city’s council officers to mean that the Greens are not entitled to a formal voice in general city council press releases.

This is despite there being absolutely no constitutional or legal reason whatsoever why the Green Party can’t appear in this kind of city council press release.

And why – if the Greens are being denied a voice because they only have one elected councillor – do Business West, with no elected representatives at all, get an official voice on a Bristol City Council platform?

Can we assume then that the views of unelected millionaire businessmen are more important than elected politicians down at the Council House?

Posted in Bristol, Conservatives, Green Party, Labour Party, Lib Dems, Local government, Merchant Venturers, SWRDA | Tagged , , , , | There are 2 comments