Kim Il Beynon Speaks!

Result!

It’s the final communiqué from General Kim Il Bey-Non, Eternal Shop Steward of the Numpty Republic of Transport House.

And it’s time to celebrate the glorious victory of his son the people. “We have kept the inhouse service,” pronounces the reality-defying general to his loyal troops as he launches into a gushing tribute of the new people’s princess Helen Holland. (I don’t know either. Perhaps he wants to shag her?)

Beynon’s talking utter bollocks of course. The Labour Party has made no such commitment to keep the home care service in-house. When pressed on Tuesday night, Labour studiously avoided the question although they have stated they will be calling a cabinet meeting at the earliest opportunity to halt the Lib Dems’ plans.

Even that’s been strangely delayed. An announcement of this cabinet meeting is yet to appear. Why can’t they get on with it next week? What’s the delay? Surely it can’t be that they have no idea how to implement their election promise? Are Holland and Hammond at the Council House right now rifling through the accounts in search of a few million?

Despite Kim Il Bey-Non’s pronouncements on their behalf, many home care workers are already deeply suspicious about the Labour Party, the T&G and their real intentions. The Blogger learns some are even planning to attend cabinet and council meetings to investigate further Holland and Hammond’s unanswered questions.

The fact that Beynon’s used their union subs to fund his son’s election campaign is also not going down too well with certain sections of the T&G membership. So it’ll be interesting to see if Il Bey-Non goes along to support his members in their ongoing struggle. Or are T&G members only officially supported when they ask Lib Dems questions?

Posted in Bristol, Home Care, Labour Party, Local elections 2007, Local government, Trade Unionism | | There are 4 comments

Bristol's worst Cabinet ever?

Incompetence

Some of the faces on this new Labour cabinet are horrifyingly familiar from just two years back. The unholy alliance of Holland, Hammond and Bees are exactly the team that plunged the city into a financial crisis in the autumn of 2004 as they sat back and let the social services department overspend by £18m.

The ridiculous triumvirate’s response to this crisis was to pay four people – two consultants and two officers – a director of social services’ salary each for three months and then implement a budget in March 2005 operating at the outer limits of human reason.

In order to balance the books Peter Hammond, assisted by Bees, announced – apropos of nothing – that their social services debt was just £7.1m, despite the council’s own Public Accounts Committee rejecting this figure and claiming it was impossible to quantify the debt at that time.

Hammond then offset this made-up figure by claiming that the city council would be receiving £7m more from central government that year – despite no such announcement from central government – because of an increase in the city’s population figures. In other words, Hammond’s budget consisted of a made-up debt figure offset by a back-of-the-fag-packet made-up guestimate.

When it came time for Hammond to present this fictitious budget to the full council, the cowardly little slime ball immediately threw a sickie and left it to his deputy, Helen Holland, to present this nonsense-on-stilts to the city.

That budget meeting famously culminated in a near-riot as elderly and disabled day care service users forcibly and vocally protested about the withdrawal of their services in order to balance Hammond’s cock-eyed books.

Morale in the social services department is said to have already hit rock bottom at the news that Hammond – no doubt sharpened pencil and fag packet at the ready – is back to run the social services show. One senior officer told The Blogger he fully expects an exodus of senior managers and finance officers who will not be prepared to attempt to implement Hammond’s potty demands and preposterous plans.

So much for the Labour’s old cabinet faces…

But some of the new faces in cabinet catch The Blogger’s eye too. Starting with Derek Pickup who’s been put in charge of the city’s politically sensitive education department.

Pickup has a long and not very distinguished history in Bristol. During the mid-nineties he worked in the grants section of Bristol City Council until he was mysteriously “moved aside” into Personnel at the same time as a corruption investigation into Filwood Community Centre was launched, resulting in the hasty departure of community work cronies Yvonne Edwards and Dan Lloyd to France to run a holiday villa business.

He then worked his ticket back through the council and the usual collection of voluntary sector quangos like Business in the Community to the directorship of Easton Community Centre and a safe Labour seat.

Just prior to being elected to the council in 2005, Pickup was appointed Director of Easton Community Centre where within a month he was announcing its bankruptcy and claiming that the organisation’s accounts were a total mess that had been inexplicably dumped into boxes in a corner of his office.

This financial quagmire may have proved useful in terms of accountability for the revolving door of Labour activists, councillors and their cronies that had sat on the management committee of the organisation over the previous ten years. But it also sheds a lot of light on Pickup’s peculiar set of talents. Why would anyone with even simple management skills and a basic level of financial acumen take on the directorship of an already bankrupt company?

Just the man to run the city’s crisis-ridden education department then.

The other new cabinet member that catches the eye is Councillor Mark Bradshaw. He’s selling sitting on the board of @Bristol as the jewel in the crown of his CV. Er… Yes that is the Harbourside financial basketcase that’s recently shut two-thirds of its operation and made most of its work force redundant.

So it seems the main qualification needed for a seat on a Labour cabinet now is to have been sat staring gormlessly at a balance sheet in the red and doing fuck all about it except continuing to implement a flawed and failing business plan until you go bust.

Bradshaw takes control of a department called ‘Access and Environment’. It looks like we could be in for a rough ride on the transport agenda then.

Posted in Bristol, Harbourside, Labour Party, Local elections 2007, Local government | | There are 4 comments

The Labour promises thread

Lambs to the slaughter

The Labour Party made a lot of promises at these elections. Here’s a few:

– to keep home care in-house

– to return £10m of council tax overpayments to council tax payers

– to return to weekly rubbish collections in Easton and Lawrence Hill

– to scrap the South Bristol ring road

Any more for any more?

Posted in Bristol, Labour Party, Local elections 2007, Local government | | There are 4 comments

Labour's secret location to meet the people revealed

A politician covered in shit
A politician covered in shit…

Gordon Brown’s non-election roadshow hits Bristol on Saturday. He will be appearing alongside the six contenders for the deputy leadership of the Labour Party that I really can’t be fucked to list.

Due to the extraordinary levels of paranoia that now infest the semi-tragic and corrupt remnants of the Labour Party, the location of this ‘government meets the people charade’ is, of course, top secret.

However, anyone wishing to attend the event, for any reason – maybe with a large bucket of shit? – might find these instructions helpful:

The LP hustings meeting in Bristol on Saturday 26th May is at:

WISE Campus
Filton College
New Road
Stoke Gifford
Bristol
BS34 8LP

Map:
http://www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?lat=51.5125&lon=-2.5549&scale=10000&icon=x

This is on the northern edge of the city, a short walk from Bristol Parkway
station – accessible by train, bus , plenty of parking (at a price).

Buses: http://carlberry.co.uk/rfnlistr.asp?L1=BRI060&op=D

Services 73 & 74 from Bristol City Centre – up Gloucester Road to Bristol
Parkway.

The time currently given for the meeting is ‘around mid-day’. The lobby will
assemble at 11am.

For further information email bristolstopwar@hotmail.com

Spread the word

Hat tip: Bristol Indymedia

Posted in Bristol, Labour Party | | There are no comments yet

It's the Holland and Hammond show!

Bert and Ernie

Bristol Labour Party this evening took minority control of Bristol City Council with the support of the Conservative Party.

The Tories and Labour both rejected a last minute climbdown from Steve Comer’s Liberal Democrats – who promised to reconsider the privatisation of home care – in favour of a minority Labour cabinet.

The new leader of Bristol City Council is Helen Holland, her deputy and Executive for Adult Care Services is Peter Hammond and the Executive running the finances is John Bees.

Those with longer memories may recognise this team in an ever-so slightly different form from 2004 – 2005. Then Peter Hammond was leader, Holland the deputy and Bees controlled the finances.

And if memory serves correctly, this is the team that ran up an £18m debt in the social services department and had to call in two expensive consultants to explain to them how to run the department. They also had to pay off former Social Services boss, Bill McKitterick, to go away and never discuss their years of hopelessly incompetent management of the service.

The whole sorry mess culminated in the whole of the council – Labour, Tory and Lib Dem – unaminously accepting the principles of ‘The Parrott Report’. A straightforward Blairite blueprint for the privatisation of adult care services in the city – including the home care service.

That long memory might also recall that this “new” deputy leader and executive for adult services, Peter Hammond – then leader – actually proposed the report and praised the Parrott Report to the full council in that characteristically limp-wristed manner of his.

But it seems Hammond the Blairite privatiser is a thing of the past. Tonight we were treated to Hammond, man of the people and saviour of the home care service. Or were we?

In yet another ill-tempered, bad mannered and skin-crawlingly embarrassing attempt at debate, the Labour Party singularly failed to outline a clear position on home care and instead used the occasion to – again – grandstand for their carefully assembled audience of home care workers and trade unionists.

Instead of a simple commitment to keep the home care service in-house as they have appeared to promise, we were treated to vague, nice-sounding empty promises about home care:

“We will get it on a firm footing”; “there will be a level of stability”; “there will be a proper solution”; “it will be viable, workable, cost effective and fit for purpose”; “we will work with users, families, carers and the workforce”; “we will take a position on home care”.

All well and good. And this seemed to go down well with the home care workers and unions, who clearly have a level of trust in local politicians that is unwise. But are Labour keeping home care in-house as they promised?

We don’t know because Labour steadfastly refused to answer this question constantly put to them by the Lib Dems and they even encouraged the home care workers to shout down the questioners.

Muppets

This may turn out to be a big mistake by the home care workers and their union backers.

(Cartoon by Evelyn Post. Evelyn Post is The Bristol Blogger’s resident cartoonist. He has a woman’s name)

Posted in Bristol, Conservatives, Evelyn Post, Labour Party, Lib Dems, Local elections 2007, Local government | | There are 6 comments

Labour take control!

With no commitment to an in-house home care service…

More Later!

Posted in Home Care, Labour Party, Local elections 2007, Local government | | There are no comments yet

The Bristol Blookie (Live from Alcester)

Gambling

Get ready to gamble… The Bristol Blookie’s EXCLUSIVE will-not-be-beaten odds on the outcome of tomorrow night’s council meeting. (Brought to you LIVE from next door to Teddy’s Tiny Tots Nursery, Alcester)

3 – 1: Lib Dem minority administration supported by Labour.

Expect a very different approach tomorrow night from Labour leader Helen Holland after her embarrassing backfire last week. Gone will be the sneering, snarling grandstanding for the benefit of their invited audience of trade unionists and home care workers. Instead Helen and her party may well attempt a charm offensive and be very much in caring, sharing, listening mode. Maybe they will even talk about searching for consensus on this difficult issue?

The likeliest resolution to the current impasse is the “form of words” solution. The Labour Party are seeking “movement” from the Lib Dems. The Lib Dems are happy to “take some time” and “pause for reflection” before going forward. Expect some form of words around these ideas carefully crafted to save Labour’s face and satisfy the trade unions, at least in the short term.

There is a tricky balance with this resolution. “The form of words” must appear to give the impression that the home care service is saved while promising no such thing. In the long term this type of deal is likely to lead to the privatisation of the home care service although there may be a 3 month 0r so delay while the trail goes cold.

9 – 2: Lib Dem minority administration after Tory Abstention.

If attempts at the “form of words” solution break down then the Tories will push for a Labour-Tory coalition ostensibly to save the home care service. Although this will in reality be a grubby grab for power by Eddy and Abraham. This is likely to be rejected by Labour who do not want power as they know they can’t deliver on their election promises.

Labour’s refusal to take power may frustrate the Tories into abstaining if a further vote for a minority Lib Dem administration takes place. This would let the Lib Dems in. This resolution will lead to the privatisation of home care.

5 – 1: No agreement reached

The meeting breaks down with no agreement reached after another night of petty squabbling.

10 – 1: Labour – Tory Coalition

Unlikely to happen as Labour will resist power at all costs although they are stupid enough to back themselves into a corner where this is their only option.

On paper this should save the home care service. In reality, The Blogger is less sure.

12 – 1: Lib Dem – Tory coalition

This is the wild card option. Nobody has spoken about this at all. The Tories and Lib Dems are at each others’ throats although both parties are instinctive outsourcers and privatisers and the Tories are desperate for some power…

Stranger things have happened. The outcome for home care would be privatisation.

18 -1: Green Leader

If the meeting becomes entirely chaotic, a combination of abstentions, back bench indiscipline and Labour panic could provide this extraordinary – if unlikely – outcome.

Charlie Bolton has said he will go for it if necessary. It’s one of the few options that might save the home care service though.

20 – 1: Minority Labour administration

The combination of Labour not wanting power in any circumstances and the Tory desire for seats in cabinet makes this very unlikely. Labour need Tory support to form an administration and the Tories would only give that support in exchange for power.

On paper this should save the home care service. In reality, The Blogger is less sure.

25 – 1: Minority Tory administration

Very unlikely. The Blogger suggests everyone leaves town immediately if Bunter takes charge.

Posted in Bristol, Conservatives, Green Party, Labour Party, Lib Dems, Local elections 2007, Local government, Trade Unionism | | There is 1 comment

Bolton takes up the gauntlet!

Yet another successful campaign from The Blogger. Charlie Bolton has picked up The Blogger’s gauntlet and has announced in today’s Evening Cancer that he is ready to stand as leader if the leadership vacuum at Bristol City Council is not resolved tomorrow.

At the very least this should help to concentrate a few minds at tomorrow’s meeting… At best Bolton may deliver an audacious – if unlikely – Green coup of the city.

The Tories, Lib Dems and Labour have so far remained tight-lipped over this latest development in the ongoing fiasco.

I'm backing Bolton!

Posted in Bristol, Green Party, Local elections 2007, Local government | | There are no comments yet

Trade union's Bunter joy sensation

Conservatives up the anti

Ho, ho, ho. Another pronouncement from Kim Il Bey-Non, Eternal Shop Steward of the Numpty Republic of Transport House.

Now the lifelong fighter for workers’ rights is reduced to praising local Tory buffoon and notorious chancer Bunter Eddy for being “straightforward”, which is a bit like praising Peter Sutcliffe for a being a good lorry driver.

What next from Kim Il Bey-Non? The BNP have a point? Thatcher was right about the miners?

The levels of sheer panic and desperation now emanating from Transport House is really something to behold.

Posted in Bristol, Conservatives, Home Care, Local elections 2007, Local government, Trade Unionism | | There are no comments yet

"Not some madman on his own"

[googlevideo=http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-2393402568525944108&hl=en-GB]

A reader has sent a link to a film of Ligali’s Toyin Agbetu attending a bail hearing at Charing Cross police station on 25 April following his arrest in Westminster Abbey in March. The pan-Africanist was arrested after confronting Elizabeth Saxe-Coburg-Gotha and Tony Blair at a service celebrating “Abolition 200”, the establishment’s response to 200th anniversary of the abolition of the slave trade.

Agbetu is met at the police station by a considerable crowd. Most of whom had attended as a response to the entire media’s representation of Agbetu as a lone, mad protestor expressing an extremist and unpopular view.

Predictably Agbetu was not charged at the station as the CPS claim to have not yet obtained footage from the BBC of the incident. Although it is argued that the CPS are delaying charges in order to dream up a way of prosecuting Agbetu that avoids the embarrassment of discussing in open court what Agbetu said to Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, Blair and the rest of the assembled British establishment.

The film is quite long at 30 minutes. But 5 minutes in there is an interview with Agbetu that yet again reveals him to be one of the most interesting, outspoken and radical political voices in the UK today. His ability to put it right up the liberal multiculturalists of the establishment is still firmly intact.

Agbetu has to return to Charing Cross Police Station on 4 May when he may – or may not – be charged.

The News 24 footage of Agbetu’s protest has yet to surface in its entirety. However this has appeared on Youtube:

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jb8Caf1ofGc]

Posted in Abolition 200, Merchant Venturers | | There are no comments yet