The Big Arse: greenwash photo-op watch

Helen Holland - core cities conference, Nottingham

Pictured is an embarrassing clown alongside someone dressed up as Robin Hood. The question that needs to printed on that bit of paper is ‘can Bristol bear this idiot in charge any longer?’

What passes for a leader in this city makes an utter twat of herself (yet again) at the core cities conference in Nottingham last week. Anyone out there inspired? Or just maybe it makes you want to kick her head in?

Does Helen think we’re all twelve years old or something? Captions welcome (Evelyn Post is away).

Posted in Bristol, Environment, Global warming, Labour Party, Local government | Tagged | There is 1 comment

Hammond's homecare plans unravel

Peter Hammond and the Labour Party’s promise at the last local election was to keep the city’s home care service “in-house”. We might have understood from this there would be no more privatisation of Bristol city council’s home care service under a Labour council. An idea that Bristol Labour’s union friends were keen to put to their home care staff members in writing:

We have established the need for a Council to commit to its inhouse service, for the leadership of the council to commit to deliver services directly and respect its own workforce and the unique contribution we make to the communities of this City.

This looks to be in tatters tonight. Green councillor Charlie Bolton reports on his blog:

It appears that the proposals being worked on [for the home care service under Hammond’s supervision] did not include ‘not privatising home care’ as a key driver. I specifically asked this, and that was the answer I got.

Officers were also, again, unable to say what proportion of Home Care will be privatised as a result of these proposals.

This is not what Labour promised the electorate and is not what the unions told their members in May is it? The promise then was apparently not to privatise any more of the home care service. Why has this changed?

Now papers have theoretically appeared for a meeting on 20 November of the Care and Communities Scrutiny Commission, a meeting where elected councillors (and the public) can scrutinise the decisions of the relevant executive member – Peter Hammond. And this is what we find:

13. HOME CARE PROJECT: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Time limit for this item – 20 minutes
– deferred. Questions will be taken at the meeting.

(Report of the Director of Adult Community Care)

Normally there’d be a link from this item so that the public and councillors can access – what should be – public papers. Not this time. Hammond’s proposals on home care have been deliberately “deferred”, which seems to mean that nobody is able to see the extremely sensitive and controversial financial details of Hammond’s proposals for the future of the home care service.

Instead he – or rather the fall girl, head of social services, Annie Hudson – will take questions from councillors on the day. Although they will have no idea, in advance, what these financial proposals for the future of Bristol’s home care service are. This makes the job of properly scrutinising them difficult, if not impossible.

Hammond’s actions are an unusual interpretation of Helen Holland’s promise that “transparency in decision-making was absolutely paramount” for her new council back in May. Indeed Hammond’s process rather resembles a complete abrogation of the city’s democratic processes. What is in this report? And why won’t he let anyone see it in advance?

As we always knew they would have to, the Labour party look set to break clear promises that won them power in May. Although the suspicion is Hammond will attempt to fall-back on his non-committal statements in the council chamber back in May when he shamelessly dodged direct questions on his intentions for home care:

Instead of a simple commitment to keep the home care service in-house as they have appeared to promise, we were treated to vague, nice-sounding empty promises about home care:

“We will get it on a firm footing”; “there will be a level of stability”; “there will be a proper solution”; “it will be viable, workable, cost effective and fit for purpose”; “we will work with users, families, carers and the workforce”; “we will take a position on home care”.
The Bristol Blogger, It’s the Holland and Hammond show! May 22 2007

Whether Hammond gets away with his crude efforts at wordplay is down to Bunter Eddy’s benign and becalmed Conservative group, who we thought put this Labour minority administration in in May in order to keep the rest of the home care service “in-house”. Eddy and the rest of his party, if they really give a toss about the city’s electorate and the council’s home care workers, should be calling for a vote of no confidence if Hammond backslides on this. But will they?

And where this leaves Alun Beynon, the T&G bureaucrat who tirelessly sold his members the idea that Hammond and Labour were the solution to the threatened home care privatisation, is another mystery. The fact he also got his T&G members to directly campaign for his son – now Labour Councillor Sean Beynon – at the local elections on the basis that he would be saving home care – and their jobs – from privatisation begins to look even more dodgy now than it did then.

The Beynon’s are nothing short of a disgrace to the Labour movement.

Posted in Bristol, Home Care, Labour Party, Local elections 2007, Local government, Politics | Tagged , , | There are 6 comments

An invitation to the shed?

Sid and Doris's shed in Sea Mills

Sid and Doris Bonkers may soon have to send out that first gilt-edged invitation for a night out in their shed in Sea Mills.

Writer of a The Naked Guide To Bristol, Gil Gillespie, who also used to write a few smart-assed music reviews for Venue in the 90s has started a blog – 1001 Reasons Why Britain is Crap. Very amusing it is too.

You better get over there quick mind. He only started on 9 October and he’s on number 26 already.

COMING SOON: An amazing new feature!!!! Since the blogroll on here is getting rather long and unwieldy, when we can be arsed, it’ll be divided up into local blogs and national/international blogs. How’s that for user friendly?

Posted in Blogging, Bristol | | There are 3 comments

The Blogger get's it wrong, wrong, wrong

Not an admission we have to make around here that often you’ll agree and, yes, it’s hard to countenance but The Blogger’s got it wrong. On Friday we said:

In another piece of transport news, that no doubt will be an EXCLUSIVE in next week’s Evening Cancer, car drivers and commuters will be ecstatic to learn that Bristol City Council is raising long-stay parking charges by 25%.

Complete and utter nonsense I’m afraid. Total fabrication in fact. Simply a product of fertile imaginations it must be said. Because although, as predicted, the story did indeed appear in today’s Cancer we’re pleased to report it was not billed as an EXCLUSIVE!!! The Blogger’s happy to correct this uncharacteristic error.

This news was, however, enough to get The Cancer’s editor-in-chief, Mikey Norton, rolling up his sleeves and bringing out the big guns of his op/ed team to deliver an editorial on the matter. “As a transport policy it is travesty,” they thunder.

So very special congratulations need to go out to city council transport officer Colin Knight the author of this nonsense and his Labour party boss and backer transport supremo, Mark Bradshaw, for coming up with an idea so self-serving and crap that it has more-or-less united every shade of political opinion outside the Council House against them.

Will it change the minds of anyone inside the Council House? Will it fuck.

Posted in Bristol, Bristol Evening Post, Local government, Transport | Tagged , , | There are 2 comments

Bristol not a media ball balls

Nathan Barley -

Exciting news just in from the spiritual home of the laptoperati, Bristol Media.

This is the local website that acts as a sort of online support group where badly paid marketing assistants, PR nobodies, wannabe web designers, media studies graduates at a loose end, wealthy people who can optimistically describe themselves as film makers while taking too much cocaine, assorted delusionary lunatics, the kind of people who think Stephen Poliakoff is a good idea and those blokes who hang around the Watershed doing something with with Apple Macs can try and convince themselves that they’re edgy and exciting Hoxton creative types rather than clueless corporate bores working in a hopelessly conservative provincial backwater churning out unreadable press releases for bored journalists, drossy websites for the public sector that nobody ever looks at and risible corporate training videos.

Anyway, they’ve come up with a thrilling new wheeze to talk themselves up. The Krazy Kats are having an edgy and exciting Christmas Ball to “celebrate Bristol’s creative entrepreneurs” apparently. Or rather, so their strapline says here, “A hedonistic night of debauchery for Bristol’s media talent” (don’t you love the way they have to tell you they’re talented?) at that go-to venue for local hedonists, er . . . Bristol Grammar School!

And if further proof of the startling level of creative talent – that they never stop telling you about – were needed, they’ve even got a crazy name for the night. They’re calling it “The Not a Ball Media Ball” and they’re promising “an event to bring Bristol’s creative and media scene together; uniting all local, influential talent under one roof.” An event you might have thought could take place quite comfortably in Sid and Doris Bonkers’ garden shed in Sea Mills.

But no. It says here – and this is my favourite bit: “The Bristol media scene is thriving, which is not surprising when you look at the diversity of talent within the city: award winning ad agencies, animators, publishers, digital agencies and production companies – real proof that Bristol continues to give London a run for its money.”

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

Is that London, Arkansas, pop 925 they’re talking about?

Posted in Bristol, Media | | There are 18 comments

Only in South Bristol . . .

Denise Van Outen
A half-dressed Denise Van Outen who was not in Hartcliffe today

The new Morrison’s store at Hartcliffe – launched today in a hail of crazed government regeneration hyperbole that was enough to make you think they’d rebuilt the fucking Pompidou Centre brick by brick up there rather than a budget supermarket – opened at 9.00am this morning.

By 10.00am the police had arrived to make the first two arrests for shoplifting. . .

The Blogger’s only glad we didn’t cancel all engagements today and make our way there in the hope of meeting the face of Morrison’s – Denise “I like a fish counter” Van Outen – as she wasn’t there.

Instead the assembled “VIP” guests were treated to – thankfully fully dressed – Helen Holland, Prawn Dimarolo, dismal Tory Yorkshireman Ken Morrison and Royston Griffey prancing like a tit in his mayoral regalia.

Star-studded or wot?

Posted in Bristol, Developments, Hartcliffe, MPs | Tagged , , , | There are 2 comments

Will our new museum be Bristol's very own chamber of financial horrors?

Museum of Bristol

Blimey. It looks like Bristol’s Tories have finally woken up and decided to start acting like an opposition after six months of pointless fawning over Labour’s Bees-Holland-Hammond council leadership triumvirate of proven incompetents.

They even appear to have bothered to read one of the daft proposals(PDF) going before the city’s Labour cabinet later this month. Indeed Friday found Tory deputy Geoff Gollop – the one that can do sums – in the pages of The Evening Cancer asking some much-needed questions about “Barnett’s* Folly”, the proposed Museum of Bristol development project on the site of the much loved old Industrial Museum.

Gollop has noticed that the purpose of next week’s cabinet meeting seems to be to agree to a cost increase of 25% for building the new museum. Without a brick even being laid, the capital costs of the project have crept up £5m to £25m. An increase that Bristol’s long-suffering council tax payers will of course have to meet.

Gollop says: “This is madness. I think we could be comparing it to Bath Spa because we don’t know what additional costs may be lurking. We are seriously vulnerable here and we need to assess the risks. There is a good case for a museum of Bristol – but not at any price. For me, I think £20 million would have been the upper end.”

Not the view of Labour’s profligate leadership though. Rosalie Walker, the executive member supposedly overseeing the project, assures us: “This is a marvellous project and it’s going to be very successful.”

Although she does concede there has been some “uplift” in the costs. Uplift!!! More like a rocket into the outer fucking stratosphere.

But no worries says Rosalie: “It’s more money than it was last year, I agree. But I would be horrified if it ended up being anything more than the new figure of £24.7 million.

She may well be horrified but she’s failed to deliver any kind of guarantee whatsoever that costs won’t rise further hasn’t she? And let’s face it Labour’s record on rising development costs is not impressive.

They’re still arguing the toss using lawyers and CONsultants, at more expense, over their £6m overspend for Redland Green School for instance.

However, it’s not just the cost of building the place that should be cause for concern. The proposed revenue costs – the costs to run the place day-to-day – are also looking like a problem.

According to the projections, the museum – at present – will cost £992,000 pa to run and it’s proposed that over one third of this will be magically raised through the museum’s conference facilities. It’s also proposed that a further phenomenal £300,000 pa will be raised through cuts in the council’s museum budget elsewhere.

The city council is currently describing these targets as “ambitious”. That’s local government jargon for “pie-in-the-sky”. You need only look at the example of @Bristol, also on the Harbourside, that’s recently had to close two-thirds of its operation because of . . . Wait for it . . . Revenue funding problems to realise this.

So not only are council tax payers underwriting an open cheque book for building the place, we’re also being signed up to fill the inevitable huge funding gap to run the place. this is currently estimated by those in the know at something between £250-£500k a year already.

Although precise figures are hard to come by because so far the council has only provided a revenue budget “in summary”. In their Cabinet Report they explain that “The planned revenue budget for the Museum is set out in Appendix 4”. However, due to some strange oversight there’s no Appendix 4 attached to the report!

Yes that’s right. The cabinet is about to agree to spend £25m on a project without even getting sight of detailed revenue projections for running it afterwards.

The words expensive and fiasco come to mind.

* By the way, anyone seen the twat originally behind this farce, the council’s Head of Culture, Paul Barnett lately?

Posted in Bristol, Conservatives, Developments, Harbourside, Labour Party, Local government, Politics | Tagged , , | There are 6 comments

Mailer

Norman mailer

The last 25 years haven’t been particularly kind to Norman Mailer, who died yesterday, as his various attempts to produce “The Great American Novel” all ended in dismal and embarrassing failure.

But go a bit further back and The Armies of the Night, his account of the 1967 march on the Pentagon, is probably the single best piece of writing to come out of the 1960s. Not far behind comes 1968’s Miami and the Siege of Chicago; in yer face accounts of the Republican and Democrat Conventions of that year.

The Democrat Convention in Chicago, of course, culminated in the ‘Chicago Eight’ trial where the so-called ring leaders of the protests there were charged with conspiracy and incitement to riot.

Both books are triumphs of engaged journalism, a form virtually lost to us today. RIP Norm!

Posted in Journalism, Media | Tagged | There are no comments yet

New additions

A couple of new additions to the blogroll. _saturnine who provided the recent Philip Street graffiti photos also has a blog, mainly of photos, here.

Bristol Anarchist Black Cross, campaigning for prison reform have also recently started a blog. Their main story at present seems to be a critique of Venue for apparently attacking prisons campaigner, Pauline Campbell.

Perhaps they missed this article from March’s Venue about Ms Campbell and her work?

23 march 2007

SAFETY FEARS FOR WOMEN PRISONERS

Self-inflicted injuries, attempted suicides and deaths are a common occurrence at Eastwood Park Women’s Prison. Anne-Marie Rogers asks if the authorities are doing enough to address the situation.

An unannounced inspection of Eastwood Park Women’s Prison and Young Offenders Institute, South Gloucestershire, in March 2006 found that “there had been no co-ordinated learning from previous deaths in custody”. Since then two more women at the prison have died of apparently self-inflicted injuries.

The first, Lisa Woodhall, died in October 2006 aged 28. More recently, Caroline Powell, a 26 year old mother of five, died on 5 January 2007 while being held at the prison on remand. Inquests into the two deaths have yet to take place.

Last year the inquest into the death of Justine Rees at Eastwood Park heard how she had died of an overdose of illegal drugs in June 2005. The coroner recorded a verdict of accidental death.

Sadly, these thre cases are not unusual. There were 432 self-harm incidents in January 2006 involving 36 women, most involving the use of ligatures and self-inflicted cuts.

Eastwood Park is a local women’s closed prison with capacity for 362 women, young offenders and children, serving the west of England and South Wales. The prison opened a detoxification unit in 2003, a mother and baby unit in 2004 and, in October 2005, the Mary Carpenter Unit, which holds girls under 18.

The prison received a critical inspection report in 2004, and the unannounced reinspection last year highlighted a range of failings at the prison. It stated that “there continued to be insufficient attention to first night procedures (when many suicides occur), levels of self-harm remained exceptionally high and there was still no coordinated learning from previous deaths in custody. Anti-bullying procedures needed attention” and concluded that “Staff were still hard pressed to ensure the safety of some very damaged and needy women”.

Andy Brown, a project worker for Community Links for Ex-Offenders based in Hartcliffe, regularly visits women from the South Bristol area in the prison. He says women offenders are particularly affected by their time in custody, as they tend to be further away from their homes – there are fewer female prisons. Their home life often falls apart while they are inside – unlike male offenders who often have a woman at home to keep things together. The main concerns of the women he sees are “staffing levels, bullying and lack of activities to occupy them outside of cells”

Many of the women in the prison’s care are vulnerable – of the 4,334 women in prison in England and Wales, 70 % suffer from two or more mental disorders and many have been victims of childhood abuse, sexual abuse and domestic violence. Some 55% test positive for class A drugs on arrival in custody.

Prison insiders talked to Venue about a culture of bullying that left many women isolated. Much bullying occurs when time out of cells is twinned with a lack of purposeful activities – which is the case at Eastwood Park.

There is lack of staff on some wings and staff are not properly trained to deal with the womens’ drug issues, which has a big impact on reoffending rates and prisoner rehabilitation. The reinspection stated that ” although the new detoxification unit was providing a good initial service, prison officers lacked training and follow-up care was limited”.

All this leads prison reform campaigners to ask whether many of these women should be in prison in the first place. Around 90% of women are imprisoned for non-violent crimes and, according to the Home Office, the courts are imposing more severe sentences on women for less serious offences.

A Prison Service spokeswoman says: “Custody remains appropriate for women who are serious or persistent offenders. However … we are aware that there are people in prison who ought not to be there, including vulnerable women. The Government is keen to encourage greater use of community alternatives for women wherever possible”.

The director of the Prison Reform Trust, Juliet Lyon, says: “So many women in prison are mentally ill. So few have committed violent or serious crimes. So much of their offending is a public health, rather than a criminal justice, concern. This long standing problem could be solved, not by investing in more women’s prisons, but by providing diversion at police stations and courts, mental health care, drug treatment, debt counselling and women’s support and supervision centres across the country.”

With two recent deaths, a drug related death within the prison and high self-harm rates, is the prison doing enough to ensure the safety of the inmates? A Prison Service spokeswoman told Venue: “Eastwood Park has done a lot to improve its care of vulnerable women. The Prison staff work hard to ensure women are kept safe and have established good working relationships with the prisoners. Eastwood Park has introduced a Carousel Course, delivered by clinical psychologists, which has a proven success rate where participants have dramatically reduced self-harm or stopped completely”.

This may have come too late for the families of Justine Rees, Lisa Woodhall and Caroline Powell but we will have to wait to see whether it can improve things for the women and children currently in the care of Eastwood Park.

ONE MOTHER’S CAMPAIGN: PAULINE CAMPBELL

Less than 24 hours after arriving at Styal Prison, Cheshire, Sarah Campbell was dead. “She told them that she’d taken the pills but they just locked her in a cell on her own”. says Sarah’s mother, Pauline Campbell.

The jury who heard Sarah’s shocking case said that there had been a failure in the duty of care which contributed to her death. After a long battle led by her mother, last year the Home Office finally conceded liability for Sarah’s death.

After Sarah’s death in 2003, Pauline Campbell, a retired teacher, started demonstrating outside prison’s where women had died. Since 2003 she has organised 21 demonstrations and has been arrested 14 times, most recently during a demonstration outside Eastwood Park prison following the death of Caroline Powell. She is due to appear at North Avon Magistrates’ Court 30 March.

She initially undertook the campaign to honour her daughter’s memory, then she felt the need to raise public awareness about the continuing suffering and deaths of women in prison. She feels that with her professional background she is in a more powerful position than many of the other bereaved families to challenge the authorities.

It was her campaign about deaths at Styal – there were six deaths between August 2002 and 2003- that led Baroness Jean Corston, former MP for Bristol East, to undertake a review into the provision for vulnerable women in the criminal justice system. The review is due to be published in March and is expected to be a damning indictment on the jailing of vulnerable women.

“There have been 34 deaths since Sarah, mostly mothers, it’s just not acceptable” says Pauline, “Just look at how we’re treating vulnerable women in the 21st century. We need fewer people in prison and to improve the staff/inmate ratio because the legal duty of care is not being upheld”.

Posted in Activism, Blogging, Bristol | Tagged , | There is 1 comment

Full of Eastern promise?

Bristol East MPs old and new in the news this week. The former MP until 2005, Jean Corston, the New labour ultra-Blairite ultra-loyalist whose ruthless focus on her Westminster career rather than her constituents saw her rise to be Chair of the Parliamentary Labour Party, is now sitting in the House of Lords as Baroness Corston of St George while also claiming an enhanced parliamentary pension claimed on the basis that she was too ill to continue working in the Commons.

Anyway, it seems Jean’s miraculous recovery is continuing apace because Tuesday saw the Baroness not only at the state opening of Parliament but even delivering the proposal to accept the new Queen’s Speech to the House of Lords.

Jean’s speech was yet another masterpiece of the kind of self-aggrandising patronising tosh that seems to come entirely naturally to that Blair babe generation. Corston told the Lords, with a straight face:

I was very proud of the fact that after we came to power in 1997 it was in the poorest parts of my constituency of Bristol East—areas that are not on any tourist map—that the first new school and health centre were built. Now every secondary school in Bristol has been or is being rebuilt. Such things matter, and not only for teachers and health professionals; the quality of local services is seen as a direct reflection of the worth that we place on local communities.

Such things do indeed matter Jean and if “the quality of local services is seen as a direct reflection of the worth that we place on local communities” then the reality is that you value Bristol East very little.

Because behind the spin about new school buildings and new hospitals lies the reality of public services in Bristol. That’s an education system glued to the bottom of the national league table where 50% of parents choose to take their kids out of the city to be educated elsewhere and a hospital trust topping the tables for incidences of c-difficile because Labour’s management are unable to keep our hospitals clean.

Thanks Jean for confirming what you think of our communities here in Bristol.

In further news this week it now appears that Corston’s replacement, the jobbing Labour lawyer Kerry McCarthy has politics to right of, er . . . Hampshire’s WI!

We kid you not. This week saw the WI from that most conservative of home counties calling for licensed brothels in order that there’s places for prostitutes to work from in safety. The WI members took this decision as a direct response to the murders last year of street prostitutes in Ipswich.

McCarthy meanwhile, as The Blogger reported two weeks ago, is supporting the government’s 55th Criminal Justice Bill since 1997 that proposes yet more of the same old failed police and criminal justice-led initiatives to resolve the street prostitution problem afflicting parts of her constituency.

What a joke. And what a personal embarrassment for McCarthy and for the rest of the Labour Party. At 40, McCarthy should be representing the bold new future of the Labour Party and working class politics in the UK. And what do we get? Failed Blairite crap that will do nothing for the residents of East Bristol but might play well in the key marginals of middle England.

McCarthy is currently bleating on her blog about being called a Stalinist by Tory MP Dominic Grieve. Can’t think why that might be. Can you?

Posted in Bristol, Labour Party, MPs, Politics | | There are 2 comments