Labour funding: local angles (1)

While leafing through the Electoral Commission’s register of donations to political parties we find a most unusual couple of entries.

It seems that the Bristol Labour Group – an unincorporated association registered at the Council House – made two donations amounting to exactly £10,000 to the Bristol North West Constituency Labour Party this year.

Due to boundary changes, the Bristol North West seat, currently held by Labour’s Doug Naysmith, is likely to be a marginal seat at the next election and the Tories appear to be throwing considerable resources into the area for their well-connected parliamentary candidate Charlotte Leslie.

Now it seems the Labour Party are doing the same for their London-based Oxbridge lawyer candidate, Lambeth councillor Sam Townend (Blogger Passim). No problem there really. If the Tories have the mysterious Lord Ashcroft throwing money at marginals why shouldn’t Labour do the same?

Well the difference is, although we might not like it, at least we know who the Tories’ money has come from. We don’t with this Labour donation.

As an unincorporated association, the Bristol Labour Group – which presumably consists of Bristol’s Labour councillors – does not have to present any public accounts. We therefore have no way of knowing the origin of this £10,000. Hardly the best example of Helen’s Holland’s new “open and transparent” regime is it?

Moreover this is an awful lot of money to raise. Are Helen and Peter Hammond down at the Whitchurch Car Boot every Saturday? (Er, not any more. They shut it down last month! Ed) £10,00o works out at £400 per councillor, a considerable amount of money if they’ve donated it themselves, particularly for a group that has fought some tough and expensive local election campaigns themselves this year.

And are Helen and Peter aware that unincorporated associations are liable to Corporation Tax? So let’s hope the Inland Revenue have been fully informed about this Labour Party fund apparently awash with cash.

And while everything may well prove to be above board in this particular case, the process that Holland is running for donating money to Bristol’s Constituency Labour Parties is easily open to abuse. How do we know – given the current climate in the Labour Party – this unincorporated association isn’t being used as a conduit by an individual donor wishing to hide their identity?

We don’t. There’s no publicly available checks and balances in place. We have to instead rely on trust! The Blogger will be delving deeper into this . . .

This entry was posted in Bristol, Labour Party. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Labour funding: local angles (1)

  1. Pingback: Labour funding: local angles (1)

  2. Jon Eccles says:

    Yes, yes, but what about the news? You know, Bristol City’s new stadium. I’m relying on you to know someone who knows someone who knows someone who knows where it’s going to be.

  3. dave angel says:

    I thought the Evening Post said the big flat bit of land next to David Lloyd and the Ashton Park and ride has been earmarked for it.

    Ideal really, good transport links – busses run to it before it is built, now that has to be a first for Bristol’s planners.

    Back to the Bloggers matter in hand, I am amazed he is even surprised that local Labour funding may be not quite transparent.

  4. bristolian youff says:

    brick with randsom(steal one of the shine-ear cars parked outside) note through council house window until the truth is out…..

  5. Pingback: Labour funding: now we have an association of one! « The Bristol Blogger

  6. Pingback: Illusions of ten grand « Bristle’s Blog from the BunKRS

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *