Parking mad

Extraordinary news of what passes for senior management at Bristol City Council has arrived.

It seems a very senior person within their Parking Services operation has recently been suspended from work after he decided to take a photograph of his cock on his mobile phone and send it to all the female members of his team!

Then – once this freak was finally suspended and safely removed from anywhere near his long suffering staff – a search of his office revealed that there was a loaded air gun in the top drawer of his desk!

No doubt there’s a perfectly rational – and pension-saving – explanation for it all.

I’m also told that you should feel free to park wherever you like in East Bristol when it’s raining as all the Parking Services staff there prefer to stay indoors in the comfort of their St Phillips offices watching DVDs as they don’t like getting wet, poor dears.

So perhaps Labour transport boss, Mark Bradshaw, could address the current management mess within his parking department before he starts stinging inner-city residents for his new residents parking scheme? I mean, if he were to run the current operation properly, it might actually make us some money and cut congestion like he claims he wants to do right?

However, on current form, it looks like we’re destined – for our forty quid plus a year residents parking fee – to have a load more lazy tossers watching DVDs at our expense who are overseen by some perverted retard whose main qualification for the job will have been their regular attendance at the Parking Services Boys Skittle Nights for the last ten years.

Bristol City Council. Dontcha love ’em?

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Labour Party, Local government, Politics, Transport | Tagged , , | There are 13 comments

Lost and found

I think Kerry McCarthy might’ve borrowed it Alistair.

Posted in Bristol, Labour Party, Politics | Tagged , | There is 1 comment

Bristol first!

“It’s a world first,” thunders Merchant Venturer George Ferguson on the subject of the ‘cycle houses’ he’s planning to build on the Bristol and Bath Railway Path.

Er, no it isn’t George. Even leaving aside the fact that the ‘bridge’ from your houses’ 2nd floor cycle store to the path will in fact be a rather cycle unfriendly set of steps because of the gradient involved, our man on his bike in Holland assures us, “We have these already in Holland they’re just not hyped in this way. They’re just sold as houses, as are the other 6000 on this estate, and any number of others around the country, all of which just happen to be nice and convenient for cycling to the city or anywhere else.”

Oh dear. Are the great red-trousered architects plans in ruins? Or will they be rebranded to live another day?

But it ain’t all bad news for the Merchant Venturers. They may well have delivered at least one world first this week as their Merchant’s Academy in Withywood finally opens its doors.

Would I be right in thinking that this is the first state school in the world to be run by toenail worshippers?

Have you ever worshipped toenails? Or other bodily waste matter? Get in touch, we’d love to hear your story.

Posted in Bristol, Cycling Demonstration City, Developments, Easton, Environment, Housing, Merchant Venturers, Transport, Withywood | Tagged , , | There are 2 comments

Eyeball pleaser

Photo by knautia at Bristol streetart

Posted in Bristol, Bristol Evening Post, Culture, Graffiti, Media | Tagged , | There are 6 comments

The empire strikes back

George Ferguson and his shadowy money men from Square Peg have been on the internet today desperately attempting to apply some positive spin to their beleaguered Railway Path development. They’ve even knocked together a special logo (above) to try and impress us.

They’re basically now claiming that some of their sketches they’ve issued may have been out of date and a little confusing, so they’ve done some new ones with a lot of green colouring-in on them for us.

There’s also some waffle about “ecology consultants” and promises to plant some apple trees, presumably to offset the sight of the pair of eight storey flats they forget to mention they’re building on the path. You can read the whole thing here.

Campaigners, meanwhile, have already produced an early rebuttal to Ferguson & Co’s efforts:

1. It’s clearer than ever that the SALE LAND is vital in this matter. The preservation of the line of mature hedge bushes and the rural ambiance of the Railway Path depends on keeping that land in public ownership, where it belongs. We are determined not to allow the sale to proceed.

2. The Squarepeg response shows that they’re rattled. They’ve seriously misled the public over the status of the sale land and that is now a matter of public record. There has been NO environmental impact assessment and NO proper public consultation. They will try to divert attention from that but we will keep focusing on it.

3. Squarepeg seem to be saying that if they don’t get the land we don’t get the cycle orientated aspects. That just shows that they’re not really committed to the cycle orientated aspects but are just using it as a pretext for taking out a substantial strip of the Railway Path land. Squarepeg have plenty of room within the existing site but they have chosen to use a large area of it to accommodate parking for 260 cars! Now they want to take the Railway Path land for housing to compensate for that.

4. Squarepeg are still keeping quiet about the tower block that they want to build on the sale land. None of the residents wanted the tower block near their streets so they’ve moved it to this site right next to the Path. Users of the Path deserve a proper opportunity to be consulted on whether they want what none of the residents want – a tower block looming over them.

5. The latest Squarepeg sketches appear to show (upper sketch) the ramps from the Path to the “cycle” houses as STEPS. What use is this for cycle access? But it’s quite clear from the same sketch that a ramp would be far too steep. It doesn’t look like they’ve thought this through properly.

6. The sketches show trees planted hard up against Path. This is not acceptable since the current standard for such paths is that there should be CLEAR verges either side of about 1 metre to allow more flexibility when path users pass each other (e.g. being able to ride or walk right to edge of path or even onto the verge in emergency). These are important safety matters. Also the foliage of trees will grow out into the path and obstruct vital sightlines at the access points.

7. The sketches are grossly misleading. Lower plan sketch shows clearance from Path to housing of at least 7 metres! In fact there will be no more than 4 metres clearance along most of the development. The 7 metres applies to only to the southern extremity of site near Carlyle Road where the existing verge widens. The upper sketch is more realistic in that path/housing clearance there is indeed about 4 metres.

8. The Squarepeg notes claim that “the current buildings run right up to the edge of this land with brick and concrete walls.” This land refers to the land on which the houses will be built, mainly the sale land and the embankment beyond to the northeast. The Squarepeg statement is UNTRUE for that land. The brick and concrete walls only apply to the southwest half of the site/Path boundary. Our concerns are overwhelmingly with the northeast half of the site boundary, as they know perfectly well.

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Cycling Demonstration City, Developments, Easton, Environment, Local government, Politics, Transport | Tagged , , , | There are 41 comments

Railway Path: that leaked document in full

Here’s that leaked briefing note on the Railway Path from council officers to councillors in full.

I understand it originated in the Property Services Department, hence the blatant arse covering exercise we find early on – “Instructions were subsequently given to Property Services to proceed.”

Nice example of the new super-efficient “One Council”, corporate working style launched by that charlatan of a Chief Exec, Bum Disease Ormondroyd, and her ‘new’ management team this Monday predictably collapsing into chaos and recriminations by, er … Wednesday!

Look out for the relaunch coming soon …

Briefing Note – Land Adjacent to Former Elizabeth Shaw Chocolate Factory

Squarepeg the owners of the Former Elizabeth Shaw Factory in Greenbank contacted the Council in December 2007 over the possible purchase of the land outlined in red on plan N5078b. This Council land is currently leased to the former owners of the Elizabeth Shaw Factory at a rent of £100 pa to be used for an access onto the cycle path and landscaping. Squarepeg’s proposals are to incorporate the land within the redevelopment of the former chocolate factory site which is to be developed into a mixed use site of retail, business and residential units.

Several concerns were raised over the potential sale of the land by the Nature Conservation Officer and the Transport Development Control Manager. The initial response was that the Council would not wish to sell the land. Further discussions between chief officers in CLS (Culture and Leisure Services – Parks) and PTSD (Planning Transport and Sustainable Development) and George Ferguson from Squarepeg were held in May 2008. Instructions were subsequently given to Property Services to proceed with the possible sale of this land subject to the following conditions:

1. Squarepeg engage in dialogue with Council’s Nature Conservation Officer to ensure the proposals provide necessary but reasonable compensating measures for the loss of vegetation and habitat.

2. The land sale will only be finalised if the developer receives planning permission and proceeds with the specific proposals.

3. Any structural changes to the bank will have to be agreed with the Council before works start. This is to protect BCC against works being carried out which undermine the cycle path.

4. The developer pay market value for the site.

The property was circulated as surplus in June 2008 with no department putting forward a operational requirement for the land within the four week circulation period. A formal offer from Squarepeg is awaited.

Strip of land b (The green verge of the Path along the boundary of the site, coloured green)

In July 2008 Squarepeg showed an interest in acquiring an easement or long lease of an additional strip of land outlined red on plan N5078c. This is required to access their development from the Bristol to Bath Cycle Path. They propose clearing land of vegetation and replacing with grass and landscaping. Squarepeg have confirmed that they would to maintain the site and continue to allow public access onto this land. Should the Council wish to proceed with a lease of the land it would need to advertise the proposal in the local newspaper and invite the public to comment. The matter may also need to be referred to the Parks & Green Spaces Board.

The Council is waiting for written proposals from Squarepeg as to the terms under which they will be looking to use this land.

David Bishop has indicated that he supports the grant of an easement (subject to certain conditions) as this development was referred to in the Cycle City bid application and is seen as a ‘cycle friendly’ development which will not compromise the future of the cycle path but could potentially improve it. David has indicated that he would be happy to discuss the development with any members should they have any issues with this proposal.

There it is from the horses mouth.

It seems Bristol City Council has admitted to deliberately ignoring the land disposal policy that applies to the case – the Parks and Green Spaces Strategy – and ignored the advice of its own expert officers (the Nature Conservation Officer and the Transport Development Control Manager).

Instead the recently promoted and generously remunerated new Strategic Director for City Development, David Bishop, has made a private – and seemingly personal – arrangement with George Ferguson, former city councillor and Merchant Venturer, to sell him the land.

It also appears that Bishop intends to hand more of our land over to Ferguson and Square Peg on the dubious basis that it’s “referred to in the Cycle City bid application”.

Again, Bishop is throwing the formal and democratically agreed land disposal policy he should be implementing in to the bin. Instead he is using an informal document – containing a few vague aspirations for the city that happen to be more in accordance with the outcome he and his developer friends desire – to justify his decision.

The idea that just because something’s been written down somewhere at some time by a city council officer means it can be implemented if they feel like it in preference to agreed policy by elected councillors is, of course, a total nonsense.

Bishop’s conduct over these land deals goes beyond undemocratic. It is anti-democratic. He’s willfully ignoring council policy because it doesn’t produce the outcome that he and George Ferguson want.

It’s also concerning that, as it is worth less than £250k, the decision on the sale of this land has been delegated by elected councillors to Bishop .

Should a delegated decision maker working on our behalf be meeting and entering into direct negotiations with property developers?

Shouldn’t that be the job of other officers who then report their findings to Bishop along with experts such as the Nature Conservation Officer and the Transport Development Control Manager?

Shouldn’t Bishop then be considering their recommendations in the light of the relevant policies laid out to him by our democratically elected representatives and then shouldn’t he reach an objective and impartial decision … Rather than deciding these things after lunching with Merchant Venturers?

Bishop should have to go for this. Bet he won’t.

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Cycling Demonstration City, Developments, Easton, Environment, Local government, Merchant Venturers, Politics, Transport | Tagged , , , , | There are 22 comments

Artwatch: surrealism special

The Treachery of Images, Rene Magritte 1928-29

The Treachery of Council Officers, Bristol City Council 2008

The Green Bristol Blog has just published a leaked briefing note on the Railway Path sell-off rushed out to concerned councillors this afternoon by arse-covering senior officers on behalf of David Bishop, the council’s head of planning.

The Blogger will be returning to it soon but suffice to say for now it demonstrates a total disregard for the democratically agreed process set out in the council’s Park and Green Spaces Strategy and even invents a non-existent committee they may be consulting – the Parks & Green Spaces Board. There’s no such thing, guv!

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Easton, Environment, Local government, Politics, Transport | Tagged , , , , | There are 6 comments

Gag time

Q. When is a bit of park land not a bit of park land?

A. When it belongs to Bristol City Council and they want to sell it of course!

News now reaches The Blogger that the piece of land on the Bristol and Bath Railway path that the city council is preparing to flog to local developers, Square Peg, is not subject to the council’s new Parks and Open Spaces Strategy because someone at the council has randomly decided that the land is not ‘designated’, whatever that means, as “Public Open Space”, whatever that means.

That’s right. Land on the edge of park land is not park land according to our council. This is despite the fact it looks like park land, feels like park land and is even registered to the city council’s Parks Department on their own ‘Pin Point Map’ of local authority owned land.

Convenient isn’t it? Especially if you consider that the Labour Cabinet initially wanted to sell off £200m worth of our parks and open spaces last year but was prevented by public opposition and had to settle for £100m worth instead.

And now we find officers openly ignoring their own strategy and glibly selling off park land without discussion or consultation with the public or local councillors because it is not designated by them as ‘Public Open Space’.

Where will it end? With £100m of extra park land sold off perhaps?

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Developments, Easton, Environment, Local government, Politics, Transport | Tagged , , , | There are 4 comments

There goes the parks strategy …

There’s a nice story over on the Green Bristol Blog that’s discovered the city council is quietly negotiating a sell off of a strip of land on the Bristol and Bath Railway Path at Greenbank to mystery property developers, Square Peg, for a speculative housing development.

This news comes just six months after the introduction of the controversial ‘Bristol Parks and Green Spaces Strategy’, an attempt by the Labour Council to raise cash for park improvements through the sale of land of – what they call – “low recreational value”.

So have some council officers decided on our behalf that land around the Railway Path now has a “low recreational value”?

Let’s hope not for their sakes, as the strategy they’re supposed to be working to – that’s been very clearly set out for them by their elected bosses in a lovely glossy booklet (pdf) – sees it slightly differently.

For starters, on page 28 of this brand spanking new strategy we find that cycleways and greenways, including the Bristol and Bath Railway Path – which is even named in the document – are included.

Then page 44 assures us:

“This strategy document is not the end of the decision making process or to community involvement in what happens at a local level. We will develop “Area Green Space Plans ” in consultation with local people and ward councillors, making specific proposals to improve quality and facilities and provide the parks people need in their local area …

… Part of the analysis for producing Area Green Space Plans will be an assessment of value of those spaces identified as candidates for change of use or disposal.”

So where the hell is the “Area Green Space Plan” for this section of the Railway Path, which seems to have been made a prime “candidate for change of use or disposal”?

Surely senior city council officers wouldn’t be engaging in a free-for-all sale of bits of our city’s park land to friendly local developers and ignoring our democratically elected representatives’ written instructions would they?

Posted in Bristol, Bristol East, Cycling Demonstration City, Developments, Environment, Housing, Labour Party, Local government, Politics, Transport | Tagged , , , | There are 28 comments

Through a glass darkly

Kerry McCarthy’s put me on this chain blog thing instigated by Iain Dale, where I have to recall where I was, what I was doing and how I felt at certain key moments in history:

Princess Diana’s death – 31 August 1997

I was living in St Andrews at the time without a telly. A friend however, who had a room in what used to be the old Buddhist Centre at the bottom of Cromwell Road, had cable TV. And more importantly Sky News …

I can’t remember exactly what we’d been doing that evening – although in all probability we’d been drinking in Montpelier pubs – but we were back at Cromwell Road and up late, as I still used to smoke quite a lot of dope back then, when we got the news flash about the accident in Paris.

Perceptive as ever, I came out with something along the lines of “Wow! That’s big news” and we waited around for further updates. I don’t recall whether I heard the official announcement of her death or stumbled off home but it was pretty obvious she was dead anyway.

The next day we were drinking at the Cadbury House at lunchtime and hooked up with the Saturday night/Sunday morning party crowd. I remember an afternoon of good humour and bad jokes where nobody seemed particularly bothered about Di, let alone distraught as sections of the media wanted us to believe.

Margaret Thatcher’s resignation – 22 November 1990

I was living in Toronto at the time, without a telly, so I guess I would have read about it in the Globe and Mail, Canada’s only national broadsheet.

Obviously the news wasn’t on the scale it was here although I recall a lot of people asking me about it as I was English. Thatcher was a lot more respected and popular among ordinary people there than she ever was here and many people were surprised by the vehemence of my dislike of her.

Even on the left Thatcher had a bit of a following. These were the days of the rise in Canada and especially Ontario of the New Democrat Party – a sort of proto-New Labour Party – which had grabbed power in the state that autumn under Bob Rae. They subsequently spectacularly imploded I believe.

Better than the Thatcher resignation itself, I can recall a long conversation with a New Democrat, who had briefly worked as the foreign editor of the Toronto Star, about who was likely to succeed Thatcher. In my naivety I claimed Hurd would, only to be told that it would almost certainly be Major as he could win an election for them and the English Tories were all about winning elections.

The same person told me the following spring that there was likely to be a war in Yugoslavia. Like many at the time I was focussed on the first Gulf War and never really registered the significance of this.

Attack on the twin towers – 11 September 2001

I was working in Easton at the time and a colleague came in and said that a plane had been flown into the World Trade Center by terrorists. Probably for the first time – for a really big news event at least – I tried to find out more from the web.

I can’t remember whether I was still using dial-up or we had just got broadband but it took about ten minutes to get on to the BBC site. And once I had seen the still pictures I went in search of a TV.

There wasn’t one in the building but a colleague was listening to the radio – Five Live I think – where the soundtrack of noises, screams and cries of anguished Americans sounded like something out of a Hollywood movie.

At some point Cliff from The Plough arrived and announced he’d opened the pub early. A few of us went over, had a pint and watched the towers collapse.

England’s World Cup Semi Final v Germany – 4 July 1990

My first thought on hearing this was that I didn’t see it because I was at Glastonbury. I can definitely remember listening to 1986’s ‘Hand of God’ there as we were sat outside the tent with it on the radio and were getting so much interest from passers-by we eventually started pinning updates on the tent.

But having checked the dates, it seems the match was a week after Glastonbury. This is a shame as this was the year rave hit Glastonbury with a vengeance – The Happy Mondays played and a large, raucous travellers site could be found just the other side of the fence – which would have made for some entertaining stories.

The upshot of this is that I have no idea where or if I saw the match. I actually spent most of the summer living in the suburbs at my parents on the rebound from a spectacularly ill-judged and doomed relationship that had inevitably collapsed with some assistance from a small mountain of cheap gak and the kind of strong liquor I don’t usually drink, much.

The plan was to get some money together and clear off abroad. To this end I was working in a scummy little factory building air conditioning units where an ex’s schoolfriend was also working. He too was at his parents trying to fund his way through a degree in contemporary literature at Bournemouth University by working in the butchery department of Sainsburys at weekends and building air conditioning units during holidays.

Very little money was actually ever saved though as we both used to leave work every night and go straight to the pub for six hours. We favoured this 1970s brick built dump, whose name escapes me, used entirely by middle aged alcoholics and losers where we could sit quietly in the corner and talk morosely about Milan Kundera novels.

President Kennedy’s Assassination – 22 November 1963

Before my time.

I also have to nominate five others to do this. As we’ve had a local Labour Party member do this, we might as well have a Green – Vowlsie – a Tory – James Barlow – a Lib Dem – Neil Harrison plus a couple of random locals – someone from Connecting Bristol and Matt at PRBristol.

Posted in Blogging, Journalism, Media, Politics | Tagged , , , | There are 10 comments